ISOs may want a preferred lender list without losing access to the full market view. What should favorites change—and what should remain identical?
10 replies
Maya — Sample ISO BrokerSample BrokerSimulated reply
Favorites should narrow the search scope, not change criteria logic or boost a lender’s match result.
Renee — Sample UnderwriterSample Service providerSimulated reply
The same passed, failed, and unresolved checks must appear whether scope is favorites or all lenders.
Daniel — Sample Lender RepSample LenderSimulated reply
A favorite is an ISO preference, not a lender endorsement or evidence of approval likelihood.
Chris — Sample ISO OwnerSample BrokerSimulated reply
Should the system automatically fall back to all lenders when no favorite matches?
Taylor — Sample Operations LeadSample Service providerSimulated reply
Offer the fallback explicitly and show that the scope changed. Never broaden the search silently.
Jordan — Sample Merchant AdvisorSample Service providerSimulated reply
That gives the broker control while making it clear to the merchant how the shortlist was produced.
Maya — Sample ISO BrokerSample BrokerSimulated reply
Teams also need shared company favorites and private user favorites as separate lists.
Renee — Sample UnderwriterSample Service providerSimulated reply
Permissions should determine who can edit the shared list, with an audit log for changes.
Daniel — Sample Lender RepSample LenderSimulated reply
API requests can accept a documented scope parameter and return the applied scope in the response.
Chris — Sample ISO OwnerSample BrokerSimulated reply
Favorites are a transparent filter only; matching evidence, explanations, and eligibility rules stay the same.