Lender criteria questions

How should state availability be stored for lender products?

Daniel — Sample Lender RepSample Lender

A lender may operate nationally, exclude certain states, or offer different products by geography. What prevents a company-level state list from misrouting deals?

10 replies

Maya — Sample ISO BrokerSample Broker

State eligibility should be attached to the product and effective date, not only the lender company.

Renee — Sample UnderwriterSample Service provider

Merchant operating state, formation state, and owner residence can be different. Apply only the geography the criterion defines.

Daniel — Sample Lender RepSample Lender

Licensing and product structure can create different maps, so do not infer one product’s states from another.

Chris — Sample ISO OwnerSample Broker

What if a public website says “nationwide” but a current guideline lists exclusions?

Taylor — Sample Operations LeadSample Service provider

Flag the conflict, retain both sources, and require review. The more specific current product source may be stronger but should not be chosen silently.

Jordan — Sample Merchant AdvisorSample Service provider

Users need a plain explanation of which merchant location fact was evaluated.

Maya — Sample ISO BrokerSample Broker

The deal form should capture operating and formation states separately instead of one generic state.

Renee — Sample UnderwriterSample Service provider

And multi-location businesses may require manual review if the lender has not published a clear rule.

Daniel — Sample Lender RepSample Lender

Claimed lenders can confirm product-level availability and update effective dates.

Chris — Sample ISO OwnerSample Broker

Model geography by product and defined location type, preserve conflicts, and avoid company-wide assumptions.