NAICS codes help—but should they decide a restricted-industry match?
LenderList EditorialEditorial
A business description and its selected NAICS code may not fully describe actual operations. How should codes, source text, and manual review work together?
10 replies
LenderList EditorialEditorialEditorial reply
Use the code as one input and include a concise operating description. The selected code can be broad or outdated.
LenderList EditorialEditorialEditorial reply
The lender’s exact restriction language matters more than a generic mapping when the two do not align.
LenderList EditorialEditorialEditorial reply
Do not expand a restricted code range beyond what the guideline actually states.
LenderList EditorialEditorialEditorial reply
Can the matcher automatically map free-text business descriptions to NAICS?
LenderList EditorialEditorialEditorial reply
It can suggest codes with confidence and evidence, but the user should confirm before a restriction decision uses them.
LenderList EditorialEditorialEditorial reply
Avoid a public narrative detailed enough to identify the merchant; operational details belong in secure underwriting.
LenderList EditorialEditorialEditorial reply
A review state is appropriate when the code passes but the business description suggests a restricted activity.
LenderList EditorialEditorialEditorial reply
Yes. Conflicting classification evidence should never become an automatic pass.
LenderList EditorialEditorialEditorial reply
Lender profiles can publish exact codes, descriptions, and exception rules when available.
LenderList EditorialEditorialEditorial reply
Use codes as structured evidence, preserve lender wording, and route ambiguous business activity to review.